AI governance
Govern the AI agents you deploy
Your engineers ship with AI — and now run autonomous agents that touch production data and hold credentials on their own. Checklist-compliance tools were built for humans and policies; they don't see the agents. KollGuard governs the agents themselves: an inventory, a per-agent autonomy policy with a master kill switch, a tamper-evident run history, and health + behavior-drift alerts — all mapped to the EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, and SOC 2 CC6/CC7.
- Agent Watch — health, behavior-drift & security monitoring for every agent
- Per-agent autonomy policy — propose / ask / auto modes + a master kill switch
- sha256 hash-chained, tamper-evident run + action audit log
- Closed-loop remediation — agents that open the fix PR, gated by policy
- Least-privilege, revocable API keys for your developers’ agents
- Mapped to EU AI Act, ISO 42001 & NIST AI RMF — not just SOC 2
Frameworks covered:EU AI ActISO 42001NIST AI RMFSOC 2 (CC6/CC7)HIPAAISO 27001
Why teams govern their agents with KollGuard
- Vanta, Drata, and Secureframe check your policies and evidence. KollGuard governs the AI agents that act on your systems — a category the incumbents don’t cover.
- Every autonomous action is policy-gated (propose / ask / auto) behind a master kill switch, so you keep control as your agents get more capable.
- Each agent run and privileged action is written to a sha256 hash-chained audit log — tamper-evident evidence auditors accept, not a screenshot.
- This is shipped code, not a roadmap slide: Agent Watch, the autonomy policy, and closed-loop remediation are live today — and the AI-governance lead is time-boxed as incumbents bolt on AI features.
AI governance guides
SOC 2 for AI agents
How agents fall under CC6/CC7 — identity, least privilege, run logging, and the evidence auditors ask for.
AI agent security
Inventory, least privilege, behavior drift, and tamper-evident run logging for autonomous agents.
How KollGuard compares
Where KollGuard fits vs Vanta / Drata / Secureframe — and the agent-governance gap only KollGuard fills.
For security teams
Continuous posture for the systems you built and the agents you deploy, on the same controls.
Frequently asked
- Do AI agents fall under SOC 2 or HIPAA?
- If an agent touches in-scope data (PHI, cardholder, customer data) or holds production credentials, its activity falls under SOC 2 CC6/CC7 and HIPAA §164.312 audit controls. KollGuard’s Agent Watch records each run and maps it to those controls, so the run history itself becomes audit evidence.
- What can go wrong if I don’t govern autonomous agents?
- An agent with production credentials is a non-human user that can read data, change infrastructure, and open PRs on its own. Without an inventory, a policy, and a tamper-evident log, you can’t prove least privilege or reconstruct what an agent did — the exact questions an auditor or an incident review asks.
- How does the kill switch and autonomy policy work?
- Each agent tier (code PR, API-call/settings change) has a mode — propose, ask, or auto — set per tenant. A master kill switch forces every tier to “off” instantly. Even an already-approved action re-checks the live policy before it executes, so the switch can’t be bypassed by a queued action.
- Which AI-governance frameworks does KollGuard map to?
- The EU AI Act, ISO/IEC 42001, and the NIST AI RMF, alongside the SOC 2 CC6/CC7 and HIPAA audit controls that already apply to any non-human user of your systems.
Run your first scan free
Connect a repo or database. See your posture in minutes.